Watercraft Operations and Maintenance

09/23/2025 Due to restrictions with the Excel Spreadsheet for questions and responses, this document has been converted to a PDF format. 9/19/2025 Amendment 0003 to solicitation FA481925R0009 Watercraft Operations and Maintenance. The following changes will be made to the Watercraft Operations and Maintenance solicitation:

A. Attachment 10: 1. Attachment 10 due date is changed from 01 October 2025 to 15 October 2025. B. Attachment 08 Addendum 52.212-1 instructions to offerors:

1. Section N, paragraph 4 Tables, Charts, Graphs and Figures is changed from 12 point font to 10 point font.

2. Included language to exclude table of contents and glossary from Volumes II and III, for overall page count.

3. Updated Volume II Tab 3, Technical Subfactor 2 - Security Clearance changed the refence to 3.4.2.2 & 5.1.1 4. Volume II - Technical, Page 7 Changed "(2) Technical Approach" and replaced with "(2) Security Clearances." 5. Volume II Tab 2 subfactor 1 Staffing Plan, a. removed "Functional Area" and replaced with "Labor Category". 6. Vol I Tab 2 Title Changed to reflect the narrative in Volume I section D. Tab 2. 7. Section T Vol 2 Tabs have been corrected to proper order.

8. Remove Mission Essential Services Plan from the evaluation criteria in Section T Volume II and include the language for Mission Essential Contractor Services Plan into Section T Volume I Tab 6. Mission Essential Services Plan will no longer be evaluated under Technical Evaluation in Volume II. 9. The narrative of the Mission Essential Contractors Services Plan have been updated to reflect those of DFARS 252.232-7024.

10. Updated Volume II Tab 4 a. Quality Control Plan to include the following language, "The offeror will be required to submit a DRAFT copy of the Quality control plan with their proposal." C. Attachment 09 Addendum to 52.212-2 Evaluations:

1. Removed title language at 1.2 and language at 1.2(v).

2. Included language at 2.1 to read as "This is a subjective trade-off source selection and, for those Offerors who are determined to be technically acceptable, tradeoffs may be made between past performance, and price in which competing offerors past performance information will be evaluated at approximately equal to price." 3. Included language at Section 4 Technical Evaluation, "Evaluation will continue until ALL responsive proposals have been evaluated." 4. Removed Mission Essential Services Plan from Section 4 Technical Evaluation of the addendum.

5. Updated Section 4.3 Technical Subfactor 3: Quality Control Plan to include the following language, "The offeror will be required to submit a DRAFT copy of the Quality control plan with their proposal." 6. Updated Section 6 Evaluation Methodology:

Step 1: Evaluate all proposals for responsiveness to the solicitation terms and conditions.

Step 2: Evaluate all responsive proposals for technical acceptability and past performance.

Step 3: Make a Best Value determination based on the offerors technical acceptability, past performance, and price.