# Request for Proposal (RFP) for Transformational Model – Battle Management Generate Battle Courses of Actions (GBC) Decision Advantage Sprint for Human-Machine-Teaming (DASH)

Canonical: https://abierto.us/opportunities/fa238425srhw3

- Solicitation number: FA238425SRHW3
- Notice type: Solicitation
- Status: Closed. Deadline was August 13, 2025 at 3:00 PM EDT
- Department: Department of the Air Force
- Agency: Department of the Air Force
- Contracting office: FA8650 USAF AFMC AFRL PZL Afrl/Pzl (FA8650)
- NAICS: 541715 Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
- Product or service code: AC11 National Defense R&D Services; Department Of Defense - Military; Basic Research
- Place of performance: Las Vegas, Nevada
- County: Clark County (FIPS 32003). https://abierto.us/counties/clark-county-nv-32003
- City: Las Vegas. https://abierto.us/cities/las-vegas-nv-3240000
- First posted: July 11, 2025
- Last posted: August 7, 2025
- SAM.gov: https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/1f57f771593840b2837f7719f9a432e3/view

## Description

While perhaps streamlining and expediting battlespace information transport and display, current and emerging C2 systems still foist battle management decision-making on the humans. One of these decision functions is Generate Battle Courses of Action (GBC). GBC considers which units, agencies, formations, platforms, or weapon systems—individually or as pre-arranged force packages—potentially can and may achieve a particular effect, and rank-orders those potential matches.

GBC takes a matched effect-effector set output from a “Match Effectors” decision (i.e., the principal effect, deliverable(s), & effector(s)), determines what other effect(s) support the principal effect, and builds a web of events representing the actions necessary for the principal effector(s) to achieve the principal effect, and for all participants to arrive in some post-execution disposition. The GBC DASH aims to answer the following core questions: How many decision opportunities are recognized/missed?

How fast can the HMT make its decision? How accurate or error free are the HMT’s decisions? How confident is the human operator in the HMT’s solution? What are some technical software attributes/requirements that must be considered along with the functional requirements? Since GBC is expected to generate more courses of actions than manual data collection and analysis processes can derive insights, a hypergraph may be the best presentation of COAs and associated paths. Software attributes will be assessed based on HMT decision speed, correctness, completeness, and user experience. Experiment details will be distributed along with this RFP.

## Publications

- July 11, 2025: Solicitation, due August 8, 2025 at 3:00 PM EDT. Notice 8c625a2c7c9c4c67951b88c5c693b198. https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/8c625a2c7c9c4c67951b88c5c693b198/view
- August 7, 2025: Solicitation, due August 13, 2025 at 3:00 PM EDT. Notice 1f57f771593840b2837f7719f9a432e3. https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/1f57f771593840b2837f7719f9a432e3/view

## Points of contact

- Breeana Dixon, breeana.dixon@us.af.mil
- Patrick Cronan, patrick.cronan@us.af.mil

---
Source: SAM.gov Contract Opportunities bulk extract. Confirm deadlines on SAM.gov before responding. Cite https://abierto.us/opportunities/fa238425srhw3.
