{"canonical":"https://abierto.us/opportunities/36c26025r0041","key":"36C26025R0041","url":"https://abierto.us/opportunities/36c26025r0041","title":"Y1DA--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab","solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","notice_type":"a","open":false,"response_deadline":"2025-06-11T22:00:00Z","first_posted":"2024-12-19","last_posted":"2025-09-19","department":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF","subagency":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF","office":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)","naics":"236220","psc":"Y1DA","set_aside":"SDVOSBC","place_state":"WA","place_county":"53033","place_county_name":"King County","place_city":"5363000","place_city_name":"Seattle","winner":"SKYTEK LLC","award_amount":"1399994.00","publications":[{"notice_id":"e4a93e9a55f843ceac731d246da9cb0b","title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","notice_type":"p","base_type":"p","posted":"2024-12-19","posted_at":null,"due_at":"2025-02-10T19:00:00Z","due_date":"2025-02-10","cancelled":null,"archived":null,"archive_date":"2025-05-20","award_number":null,"awardee_name":null,"amount":null,"link_sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/e4a93e9a55f843ceac731d246da9cb0b/view","enriched":false,"history":[]},{"notice_id":"6192acc0496742da953d244f698d1b7c","title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","notice_type":"o","base_type":"p","posted":"2025-01-13","posted_at":null,"due_at":"2025-02-13T19:00:00Z","due_date":"2025-02-13","cancelled":null,"archived":null,"archive_date":"2025-05-23","award_number":null,"awardee_name":null,"amount":null,"link_sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/6192acc0496742da953d244f698d1b7c/view","enriched":false,"history":[]},{"notice_id":"3bd75699c4c742f98ae2fc07bd0fa458","title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","notice_type":"o","base_type":"o","posted":"2025-01-14","posted_at":null,"due_at":"2025-02-13T19:00:00Z","due_date":"2025-02-13","cancelled":null,"archived":null,"archive_date":"2025-03-15","award_number":null,"awardee_name":null,"amount":null,"link_sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/3bd75699c4c742f98ae2fc07bd0fa458/view","enriched":false,"history":[]},{"notice_id":"07c64a57d2a44cb1aeaef4c8d412f2ca","title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","notice_type":"o","base_type":"o","posted":"2025-01-17","posted_at":null,"due_at":"2025-02-13T19:00:00Z","due_date":"2025-02-13","cancelled":null,"archived":null,"archive_date":"2025-03-15","award_number":null,"awardee_name":null,"amount":null,"link_sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/07c64a57d2a44cb1aeaef4c8d412f2ca/view","enriched":false,"history":[]},{"notice_id":"ba1173d7497445b4801ac8188f01f732","title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","notice_type":"o","base_type":"o","posted":"2025-02-12","posted_at":null,"due_at":"2025-02-24T19:00:00Z","due_date":"2025-02-24","cancelled":null,"archived":null,"archive_date":"2025-03-26","award_number":null,"awardee_name":null,"amount":null,"link_sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/ba1173d7497445b4801ac8188f01f732/view","enriched":false,"history":[]},{"notice_id":"08a742dabae844e68b53c7d758c28a7a","title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","notice_type":"o","base_type":"o","posted":"2025-02-14","posted_at":null,"due_at":"2025-02-24T19:00:00Z","due_date":"2025-02-24","cancelled":null,"archived":null,"archive_date":"2025-03-26","award_number":null,"awardee_name":null,"amount":null,"link_sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/08a742dabae844e68b53c7d758c28a7a/view","enriched":false,"history":[]},{"notice_id":"e69af3c322574f5192761816b94973ed","title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","notice_type":"o","base_type":"o","posted":"2025-02-20","posted_at":null,"due_at":"2025-02-28T19:00:00Z","due_date":"2025-02-28","cancelled":null,"archived":null,"archive_date":"2025-03-30","award_number":null,"awardee_name":null,"amount":null,"link_sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/e69af3c322574f5192761816b94973ed/view","enriched":false,"history":[]},{"notice_id":"255415842e1c45d2aa6240d676606534","title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","notice_type":"o","base_type":"o","posted":"2025-02-21","posted_at":null,"due_at":"2025-02-28T19:00:00Z","due_date":"2025-02-28","cancelled":null,"archived":null,"archive_date":"2025-03-30","award_number":null,"awardee_name":null,"amount":null,"link_sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/255415842e1c45d2aa6240d676606534/view","enriched":false,"history":[]},{"notice_id":"040cf0940fb345248425257a7b85d74d","title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","notice_type":"o","base_type":"o","posted":"2025-06-09","posted_at":null,"due_at":null,"due_date":"2025-06-11","cancelled":null,"archived":null,"archive_date":"2025-06-26","award_number":null,"awardee_name":null,"amount":null,"link_sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/040cf0940fb345248425257a7b85d74d/view","enriched":false,"history":[]},{"notice_id":"eb608d51de5a44bdbca363a959775031","title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","notice_type":"o","base_type":"o","posted":"2025-06-09","posted_at":null,"due_at":"2025-06-11T22:00:00Z","due_date":"2025-06-11","cancelled":null,"archived":null,"archive_date":"2025-06-26","award_number":null,"awardee_name":null,"amount":null,"link_sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/eb608d51de5a44bdbca363a959775031/view","enriched":false,"history":[]},{"notice_id":"35cf48ca06f7479693dfc00a17c725f9","title":"Y1DA--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab","solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","notice_type":"a","base_type":"a","posted":"2025-09-19","posted_at":null,"due_at":null,"due_date":null,"cancelled":null,"archived":null,"archive_date":"2025-10-19","award_number":"36C26025C0035","awardee_name":"SKYTEK LLC VANCOUVER 98665","amount":"1328499.00","link_sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/35cf48ca06f7479693dfc00a17c725f9/view","enriched":false,"history":[]},{"notice_id":"423bc94ba5064664a059d537bcc4dc14","title":"Y1DA--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab","solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","notice_type":"a","base_type":"a","posted":"2025-09-19","posted_at":null,"due_at":null,"due_date":null,"cancelled":null,"archived":null,"archive_date":"2025-10-19","award_number":"36C26025C0035","awardee_name":"SKYTEK LLC VANCOUVER 98665","amount":"1399994.00","link_sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/423bc94ba5064664a059d537bcc4dc14/view","enriched":false,"history":[]}],"latest_notice_id":"423bc94ba5064664a059d537bcc4dc14","first_type":"p","notices":[{"dates":{"posted":"2024-12-19","response_deadline":{"raw":"2025-02-10T11:00:00-08:00","utc":"2025-02-10T19:00:00Z","date":"2025-02-10","time":"11:00:00","utc_offset_seconds":-28800}},"links":{"sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/e4a93e9a55f843ceac731d246da9cb0b/view"},"naics":{"codes":["236220"],"primary":"236220"},"title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","agency":{"office":{"code":"36C260","name":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)"},"subtier":{"code":"3600","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"department":{"code":"036","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"office_address":{"zip":"98661","city":"VANCOUVER","state":"WA","country":"USA"},"organization_type":"OFFICE"},"status":{"active":false,"archive_date":"2025-05-20","archive_type":"auto_custom"},"contacts":[{"name":"Kenneth Winfield","role":"primary","email":"Kenneth.Winfield@va.gov","title":"Contract Specialist"}],"base_type":{"code":"p","label":"Presolicitation"},"notice_id":"e4a93e9a55f843ceac731d246da9cb0b","set_aside":{"code":"SDVOSBC","label":"Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Set-Aside (FAR 19.14)"},"provenance":{"extract":{"url":"https://s3.amazonaws.com/falextracts/Contract%20Opportunities/Archived%20Data/FY2025_archived_opportunities.csv","etag":"\"d47226e3d2c6545974b252e103f82b34-139\"","fetched_at":"2026-09-16T19:12:38.374141Z","row_sha256":"0a4974216884aa8b3545c1bb30ed2d3cf65594fa9cd2439bbfb5e7e9bac757f4","last_modified":"2026-09-13T14:49:20Z"},"updated_at":"2026-09-16T19:12:38.374141Z","first_seen_at":"2026-09-16T19:12:38.374141Z"},"description":{"text":"INTRODUCTION: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Network Contracting Office (NCO) 20 anticipates soliciting proposals and subsequently awarding a single, Firm-Fixed-Price Construction Contract to Renovate the Interventional Radiology (IR) Lab Project at the Seattle VA Medical Center, 1660 S. Columbian Way, Seattle, Washington, 98108. DESCRIPTION: The Contractor shall furnish all supervision, labor, and materials to completely prepare the site for building operations, including demolition and removal of existing structures, electrical, painting, and perform other work for the renovation of approximately 937 square feet of existing space in the Radiology Department to renovate for the IR Lab. ADMINISTRATIVE: The solicitation will be issued as a Request for Proposal (RFP) conducted in accordance with FAR Parts 15, 19, and 36 and will be evaluated in accordance with the procedures listed in the solicitation. The solicitation will be advertised as a total Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Set-Aside. Proposals received from other than SDVOSB concerns will not be considered. The applicable NAICS Code is 236220 with a size standard of $45 Million. The solicitation is expected to be issued in FY 2025. The period of performance is approximately 250-Calendar days from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed. The Magnitude of Construction is expected to be between $500,000 and $1,000,000.00. This notice is not a request for competitive offers. All questions must be submitted in writing to the issuing office via email to Kenneth.Winfield@va.gov by January 31, 2025, at 11:00 AM Pacific Time. Telephone calls will not be accepted.","origin":"extract"},"notice_type":{"code":"p","label":"Presolicitation"},"schema_version":1,"solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","place_of_performance":{"zip":"98108","city":{"name":"Seattle"},"state":{"code":"WA"},"street":"Seattle VA Medical Center Puget Sound Health Care System 1660 Columbian Way","country":{"code":"USA"}},"product_service_code":"Y1DB"},{"dates":{"posted":"2025-01-13","response_deadline":{"raw":"2025-02-13T11:00:00-08:00","utc":"2025-02-13T19:00:00Z","date":"2025-02-13","time":"11:00:00","utc_offset_seconds":-28800}},"links":{"sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/6192acc0496742da953d244f698d1b7c/view"},"naics":{"codes":["236220"],"primary":"236220"},"title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","agency":{"office":{"code":"36C260","name":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)"},"subtier":{"code":"3600","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"department":{"code":"036","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"office_address":{"zip":"98661","city":"VANCOUVER","state":"WA","country":"USA"},"organization_type":"OFFICE"},"status":{"active":false,"archive_date":"2025-05-23","archive_type":"auto_custom"},"contacts":[{"name":"Kenneth R Winfield, Contractor","role":"primary","email":"KENNETH.WINFIELD@VA.GOV","title":"Contract Specialist"}],"base_type":{"code":"p","label":"Presolicitation"},"notice_id":"6192acc0496742da953d244f698d1b7c","provenance":{"extract":{"url":"https://s3.amazonaws.com/falextracts/Contract%20Opportunities/Archived%20Data/FY2025_archived_opportunities.csv","etag":"\"d47226e3d2c6545974b252e103f82b34-139\"","fetched_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","row_sha256":"08f1e5d22ebae23815ba082d3463ed962d6ab2345fead1f630e70054f68c9175","last_modified":"2026-09-13T14:49:20Z"},"updated_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","first_seen_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z"},"description":{"text":"GENERAL INFORMATION This acquisition will use best value tradeoff source selection procedures in accordance with FAR Part 15, based on the best overall (i.e., best value) proposal that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government with appropriate consideration given to the non-price and price factors. This acquisition is a 100% set-aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) concerns. The exclusive responsibility for Source Selection will reside with the Government. Proprietary information submitted in response to this solicitation shall be clearly marked as such and will be protected from unauthorized disclosure as required by Subsection 27 of the Office of Procurement Policy Act as amended (41 U.S.C. 423) (Hereinafter referred to as \"the Act\") as implemented in the FAR. Any unmarked proprietary information will be considered releasable under the restrictions of the Freedom of Information Act. For submission requirements designated as shall or must, failure to provide the requested information may be considered a deficiency. For submission requirements designated as should, failure to provide the requested information may result in a lower rating for the specified factor. FORMAL COMMUNICATIONS The following Points of Contact (POC) are provided for this acquisition. Address any questions or concerns you may have to both of the POCs via email listed below no later than JANUARY 31, 2025, 11:00 AM (PST). The government is not obligated to answer any questions submitted after this date. Furthermore, all questions shall be submitted by the prime contractor(s) on behalf of their subcontractor(s) and supplier(s). Questions submitted by subcontractors and/or suppliers directly to the POCs above, or if applicable, the AE of Record, will be rejected and not answered. Clarifications and answers will be provided only in response to written requests for clarification and will be made available to all offerors simultaneously by Amendment to this solicitation. Written requests for clarification should be emailed to the addresses indicated below. The government assumes no responsibility for non-delivery due to problems with email servers, and no extensions will be granted for these issues. Kenneth Winfield Contract Specialist Contractor, Stafford Consulting Company Kenneth.Winfield@va.gov Ty Draszt Contracting Officer ty.draszt@va.gov GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Proposals must be submitted electronically via e-mail to the POCs noted in the Formal Communications paragraph above no later than FEBRUARY 13, 2025 @ 11:00 AM (PST) Submissions exceeding file 10MB shall be broken into multiple e-mails or coordinated with the POCs to assure successful file sharing. No hard copies of proposals will be accepted (hand delivered or traditional mail). The government reserves the right to request hard copies in binder format in the event of a formal protest. Proposals shall not contain classified data. The use of hyperlinks in proposals are prohibited. The government will not be responsible for proposals delivered to any location or to anyone other than the Contracting Office. Offerors are responsible for ensuring that proposals are submitted so as to reach the Contracting Office by the date and time stated in this solicitation. Offerors are cautioned to strictly comply with all instructions within this solicitation to ensure submission of a complete proposal. Failure to furnish a complete proposal at the time of proposal submission may result in an unacceptable proposal that the Government eliminates from consideration for award. The Government will not accept any changes to offerors' proposals after the closing date of this solicitation (see FAR 15.208 for further information regarding late proposals). Offerors are cautioned that parroting of the requirements of the Plans and Specifications with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of their proposal. Proprietary information should be clearly marked. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs. Disposition of Unsuccessful Proposals: in compliance with FAR Subpart 4.8, the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. FORMATTING REQUIREMENTS Proposal submission should be in PDF format compatible with the latest version of Adobe Acrobat. Offerors proposals should consist of two (2) volumes (see content requirements below). Please title files in the following format: Solicitation Number Company Name Volume 1 Technical and Past Performance Proposal Solicitation Number _Company Name Volume 2 Price Proposal Each paragraph should be separated by at least one blank line. A standard, 12-point minimum font size applies. Arial or Times New Roman fonts are required. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8-point and may be landscape oriented. Files should use the following page setup parameters: Margins Top, Bottom, Left, Right 1 Gutter 0 From Edge Header, Footer 0.5 Page Size, Width 8.5 Page Size, Height 11. . If discussions are required, pages that are revised (due to discussions or proposal revisions) should be a different color and have revised information clearly marked by a vertical line in the right margin of the page. The revised pages should be dated. The submission should be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume should be clearly identified and should begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume should be numbered consecutively and identified by the complete company name, date, and solicitation number in the header and/or footer. A Table of Contents should be included. PAGE LIMITS Proposal Volume Evaluation Factors Description Page Limit 1 1 Technical Approach 40 2 Key Personnel Qualifications 20 3 Past Performance 50 2 4 Price No Limit All pages with written content, including cover letters, Table of Contents pages, tables, illustrations, and appendices will be counted in the page calculation. Pages that exceed the page limitations will be removed, not read, and not evaluated. VOLUME 1 TECHNICAL AND PAST PERFORMANCE PROPOSAL Factor 1: Technical Approach Offerors shall submit a narrative discussion that describes Offerors approaches to the work. The narrative should: Describe an overall approach to the work that demonstrates the Offeror s understanding of the work, including creativity and thoroughness shown in understanding the objectives of the SOW, specific tasks, risks and risk mitigation measures, and planned execution of the project. Provide an organizational diagram showing clear, logical lines of authority from the Project Manager to Subcontracting Management, including Superintendence, Safety, and Quality Control. Describe teaming arrangements, including overall structure and management of the project team; identify roles, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms. Note: Any substitutions of Key Personnel from those identified in the proposal must be approved by the VA and must have equivalent or more experience. Describe how the Offeror will ensure quality consistently across the team. Factor 2: Key Personnel Qualifications Offerors shall identify and provide résumés for Key Personnel who will perform the work of this project and their assigned roles. Key Personnel will include: the Project Manager, Site Superintendent, Quality Control Manager, and Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO). All roles shall be filled by separate individuals; dual-hatting is not acceptable. The resume shall be no more than five (5) pages. The resume shall include the following information, at a minimum: Name, job title, and entity employing the individual Time in position and history of employment in position Demonstration of experience, education, and certifications, addressed in Section M of this solicitation Percentage of time dedicated to this project Two (2) professional references with phone number(s) and email address(es) The Key Personnel proposed for this factor will be binding to the offeror selected for award. Any changes to Key Personnel after contract award must be approved in writing by the Contracting Officer. Factor 3: Past Performance Offerors shall submit a minimum of two (2) and a maximum of five (5) projects completed (or if not completed at least 75% complete) within the past seven (7) years, as of the issue date of this solicitation, that best demonstrate its team s experience on recent and relevant projects that are similar in scope, complexity, size, and price to the work required under this solicitation. Note: If more than five (5) projects are submitted, only the first five (5) projects will be evaluated. At least two (2) projects shall be provided for the Prime (the entity signing the SF1442). If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), recent and relevant project experience shall be submitted for projects completed by the JV entity. If the JV does not have experience, such projects shall be submitted for each JV partner. To be considered relevant, submitted projects must be similar in scope, complexity, size, and price, as defined in Section M. To be considered recent, submitted projects must be completed (or if not completed at least 75% complete) within the past seven (7) years, as of the issue date of this solicitation. A project is defined as work performed under a single task order or contract. For each project, Offerors should submit past performance information as follows: A narrative of the project that clearly describes the scope of work performed, and the relevancy to, the project requirements of this solicitation (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods, location, customer, etc.). The role of the offeror or team member on the past project must be clear and related to that entity's roll under this requirement. For Federal Government projects with a CPARS Evaluation: provide the contract number, contract place of performance, and DUNS number. In the case of Indefinite Delivery type contracts, GSA contracts, and Blanket Purchase Agreements, include Task or Delivery Order Numbers. OR For non-Federal Government projects, commercial projects, and Federal Government projects without a CPARS Evaluation: provide a PPQ (see solicitation Attachment 6). The Offeror should complete Blocks 1-4 of the PPQ and send it to the non-Federal project client or commercial project client. The client should complete Blocks 5-8 along with the two-page questionnaire. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project before the proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit, with the proposal, the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information. The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project to obtain the PPQ information. However, offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. Alternatively, offerors may submit a copy of the client s signed PPQ for a completed contract or task order. In cases where the validity of the completed PPQ is questioned, the government may contact the reference(s) for verification or additional information. Veterans Affairs does not intend to create or maintain a database of PPQs submitted by offerors. Therefore, it will be offerors responsibilities to ensure their submission of PPQs in their proposals are relevant to the solicitation. Alternatively, offerors may obtain an updated/new PPQ from its client(s) for submission as provided above. The Government may use data provided by offerors in their proposals, and data obtained from other sources, including data in government files. The Government reserves the right to obtain past performance information from any source available and has the right to contact customers other than those listed by the Offeror to evaluate past performance. The Government reserves the right to verify statements the Offeror makes regarding its past performance to determine whether they are substantiated. VOLUME 2 Factor 4: Price Offerors should provide a table of contents and should number all pages consecutively. Volume 2 should be submitted in a separate file from Volume 1. The price proposal should be broken down into sections as defined below. Section 1: The name(s) and title(s) of the person(s) authorized to negotiate and sign a contract. Also, provide a Certificate of Corporate Authority or other applicable documentation of authorized signature(s) for each authorized individual. Section 2: The Offer (the SF1442) duly executed with an original signature by an official authorized to bind the company. Section 3: Acknowledgement of all amendments to the solicitation in accordance with the instructions on the Standard Form 30 (Amendment form). Section 4: The completed Section K of the solicitation (i.e., Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors). All cost and pricing data supplied by Offerors will represent data other than certified cost or pricing data as defined by FAR 2.101. Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements may also be accomplished via sam.gov, but must be complete and up to date prior to the proposal deadline. Section 5: Each offeror is required to complete the bid schedule (page 4 of this solicitation). Offerors shall clearly note on page 4 which alternate(s) , if any, from the Specifications Volume 2a, Section 01 00 00, paragraph 1.3, included with their base proposal. The base proposal shall include all work identified in the SOW, specifications, and drawings and each alternative is a deductive . SECTION M EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD GENERAL INFORMATION The Government intends to award without discussions. In the event that discussions with offerors are required, a competitive range may be established, and discussions conducted with all offerors in the competitive range. BASIS FOR AWARD This acquisition will use best value tradeoff source selection procedures in accordance with FAR Part 15, based on the best overall (i.e., best value) proposal that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government with appropriate consideration given to the non-price and price factors. During the evaluation of each proposal, the government will assign a rating for Factors 1-3. The following factors will be used to evaluate each proposal: Factor 1: Technical Approach Factor 2: Key Personnel Qualifications Factor 3: Past Performance Factor 4: Price Factors 1-3 are of approximately equal importance. All evaluation factors other than price, when combined, are approximately equal to price (Factor 4). VOLUME 1 TECHNICAL AND PAST PERFORMANCE PROPOSAL The term technical, as used herein, refers to non-price factors other than past performance. The purpose of the technical factor is to assess whether the offeror s proposal will satisfy the Government s minimum requirements. Factors 1 and 2 will be evaluated using the ratings and descriptions outlined below. Rating Table 1 Technical Approach and Key Personnel Qualifications Rating Descriptions Outstanding Proposal meets all requirements and presents substantial benefits identified by a combination of Significant Strengths and/or Strengths that significantly outweigh risk presented by evaluated Weaknesses, if any. Generally, no Significant Weaknesses are identified. No Deficiencies are found. Good Proposal meets all requirements and presents benefits identified by a combination of Significant Strengths and/or Strengths. If Weaknesses and/or Significant Weaknesses are present, the associated risks are outweighed by the evaluated benefits. No Deficiencies are found. Acceptable Proposal meets all requirements with essentially offsetting benefits and risks presented by Significant Strengths, Strengths, Weaknesses and/or Significant Weaknesses, if any are present. No Deficiencies are found. Marginal Proposal minimally meets all requirements but risks presented by Weaknesses and/or Significant Weaknesses are not fully offset by Strengths or Significant Strengths, if any are present. No Deficiencies are found. Unacceptable Proposal may have Significant Strengths or Strengths. However, the benefits presented are irrelevant because the proposal does not meet all requirements or has a combination of Weaknesses, Significant Weaknesses or Deficiencies that present an unacceptable level of risk. Factor 1: Technical Approach Each Offeror will receive a rating from Table 1, above, based upon an evaluation of its proposal for this factor. This factor will evaluate the Offeror s narrative describing its approach for accomplishing the work described in the SOW and project documents. In order to be considered acceptable, the Offeror must demonstrate an understanding of the specific requirements described in the solicitation and demonstrate the ability of their approach to accomplish those requirements. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the narrative: Is logical and free of contradictory or conflicting information. Describes an approach to resourcing, organizing, and communicating on the proposed project that is consistent with requirements in the project description. Provides a level of detail and specificity to this project that demonstrates that the Offeror understands the requirements. Reduces the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. Is realistic and achievable. Factor 2: Key Personnel Qualifications Each Offeror will receive a rating from Table 1, above, based upon an evaluation of its proposal for this factor. At a minimum, the key personnel must meet the minimum experience and education requirements listed below. Position Minimum Qualification Requirements Project Manager Five (5) years construction management experience, BS degree in construction management or engineering related field, and at least one of the following certifications or registrations: Active Certified Construction Manager (CCM) certified by the Construction Manager Certification Institute. OR Active Project Management Professional (PMP) certification issued by the Project Management Institute OR Active Certified Professional Constructor (CPC) certified by the American Institute of Constructors & Constructor Certification Commission OR If no certification, then Project Manager shall have ten (10) years of construction management experience instead of five (5). Site Superintendent Five (5) years of experience as Construction Site Superintendent Completion of OSHA training Contractor Quality Control (CQC) System Manager Five (5) years of construction experience on construction similar to the scope of this contract and have the following: Graduate engineer OR Graduate architect OR Graduate of construction management Safety and Health Officer (SSHO) Completion of the 30-hour OSHA Construction safety class Five (5) years of construction industry safety experience or three (3) years if the proposed SSHO possesses: Certified Safety Professional (CSP) certification OR Certified Construction Safety and Health Technician (CSHT) certification OR A safety and health degree from an accredited university or college An offeror must receive an acceptable rating for this evaluation factor to be further considered for award. If an offeror s proposal is deemed unacceptable for Factor 2, the evaluation process will stop, and the government will no longer consider the offeror for award and evaluate the next lowest offer. Factor 3: Past Performance Each Offeror will receive a rating from Table 3, below, based upon an evaluation of its proposal for this factor. When evaluating experience, the role performed by the offeror or its subcontractor(s) will be considered for consistency with the proposed role to be performed by the offeror or subcontractor(s) under this . There are three aspects to the experience and past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy, and quality of performance which are combined to establish one performance assessment for each offeror. This evaluation focuses on how well the offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted and past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources. More emphasis will be placed on the projects submitted. Each past performance submission will be determined as recent or not recent. Then, each recent past performance submission will receive a relevancy rating. Next, each recent and relevant past performance submission will be assessed for quality. As a result of recency, relevancy, and quality assessments of the individual contracts evaluated an overall Past Performance Confidence Assessment Rating will be assigned to the Past Performance evaluation factor. Only Offerors with a Past Performance Confidence Assessment Rating of \"Neutral Confidence\", \"Satisfactory Confidence\", or \"Substantial Confidence\" will be considered eligible for award. Any proposals receiving a past performance evaluation rating of \"Limited Confidence\" or \"No Confidence\" for this factor will not be eligible for award. To be considered recent, projects provided must be completed within the past seven (7) years, as of the issue date of this solicitation. More recent performance will have a greater impact on the Past Performance Confidence Assessment than less recent effort. Relevancy will be determined by projects that demonstrate completion of projects similar in scope, complexity, size, and cost or price to the solicitation requirement. When determining the relevancy of projects submitted for experience, the role performed by the Offeror or its subcontractor will be considered for consistency with the proposed role to be performed by the offeror or subcontractor for the solicitation project. The proposal review will only consider the experience or past performance of an offeror's parent or affiliated companies where the firm's proposal demonstrates that the resources of the parent or affiliated company will affect the performance of the offeror. The relevant consideration is whether the resources of the parent or affiliated company--its workforce, management, facilities, or other resources--will be provided or relied upon for contract performance, such that the parent or affiliate will have meaningful involvement in contract performance. The proposal must demonstrate a connection between the affiliate s proposed role on the solicitation project and the role of the affiliate on the past performance submitted in order to receive credit for the affiliate s past performance. Proposals may be more highly rated for the performance confidence assessment if they include projects that demonstrate any of the following: If the offeror is a JV, relevant projects where the JV entities have previously worked together may be considered more favorably than a JV where the entities have not worked together. Projects demonstrating the experience of the offeror or JV entities may be more highly rated than projects demonstrating the experience of subcontractors. Relevant experience of parent companies or affiliates will be considered equivalent to experience of the offeror only if the proposal clearly demonstrates the connection between the affiliate's proposed role on the solicitation project and the role of the affiliate on the past performance submitted. Projects where the offeror demonstrates construction experience with Veterans Affairs may be rated more favorably. Projects where the offeror demonstrates experience in the same geographical region as the solicitation project may be rated more favorably. The Government will use the following relevancy definitions when assessing relevancy of projects. Table 2 Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Rating Definition Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Quality of performance will be established by review of the past performance record. The Government will consider the performance quality of recent, relevant efforts (how well the contractor performed on the contracts). For each recent, relevant past performance citation reviewed, the quality of the work performed will be assessed. The quality assessment may result in positive or adverse findings. Adverse is defined as past performance information that supports an unsatisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comment received. For adverse information identified, the evaluation will consider the number and severity of the problem(s), mitigating circumstances, and the effectiveness of corrective actions that have resulted in sustained improvements. Offerors will receive an integrated past performance rating at the factor level. More recent performance will have a greater impact on the Past Performance rating than less recent effort. Each Offeror will receive one overall performance confidence rating as shown below. Table 3 Past Performance Confidence Assessments Rating Description Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Limited Confidence Based on the offeror s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. No Confidence Based on the offeror s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. Unknown Confidence (Neutral) * No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the offeror s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. * Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). The government will make an integrated assessment an assign a rating of acceptable or unacceptable for this Factor. A acceptable rating is a result of: An offeror submitting a list of at least two (2) projects completed (or if not completed at least 75% complete) within the past seven (7) years, as of the issue date of this solicitation, that best demonstrate its team s experience on recent and relevant projects that are similar in scope, complexity, size, and price to the work required under this solicitation. AND An offeror receiving an integrated Past Performance Confidence Assessment of Substantial Confidence , Satisfactory Confidence , or Unknown Confidence (Neutral) . An offeror must receive an acceptable rating for this evaluation factor to be further considered for award. If an offeror s proposal is deemed unacceptable for Factor 1, the evaluation process will stop, and the government will no longer consider the offeror for award and evaluate the next lowest offer. VOLUME 2 PRICE PROPOSAL Factor 4: Price The contract awarded from this solicitation will be Firm-Fixed-Price construction. Price reasonableness analysis will be performed by the Government to determine that the proposal prices offered are complete, fair, and reasonable. Price reasonableness will be determined in accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(1). Normally, competition establishes price reasonableness. Comparison of the proposed prices is expected to satisfy the requirement to perform a price analysis, however, the Government may, if necessary, request and analyze the offeror s price breakdown to establish reasonableness of an otherwise successful offeror s price. The Government reserves the right to conduct price realism analysis. The Government will review the proposed price in the context of the technical proposal. Any inconsistencies between proposed performance and price must be clearly justified. For example, if unique and innovative approaches are the basis for an abnormally low or high price, the nature of the approaches and their impact to the proposed price must be clear in the proposal. For purposes of award, the total evaluated price will include the total price noted in the schedule. EVALUATION PROCESS AND FINAL SELECTION The Government will evaluate all offers that conform to the solicitation requirements and award to the offeror whose proposal, as determined by the Source Selection Authority (SSA), conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and, if necessary, realistic, all factors considered.","origin":"extract"},"notice_type":{"code":"o","label":"Solicitation"},"schema_version":1,"solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","product_service_code":"Y1DB"},{"dates":{"posted":"2025-01-14","response_deadline":{"raw":"2025-02-13T11:00:00-08:00","utc":"2025-02-13T19:00:00Z","date":"2025-02-13","time":"11:00:00","utc_offset_seconds":-28800}},"links":{"sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/3bd75699c4c742f98ae2fc07bd0fa458/view"},"naics":{"codes":["236220"],"primary":"236220"},"title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","agency":{"office":{"code":"36C260","name":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)"},"subtier":{"code":"3600","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"department":{"code":"036","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"office_address":{"zip":"98661","city":"VANCOUVER","state":"WA","country":"USA"},"organization_type":"OFFICE"},"status":{"active":false,"archive_date":"2025-03-15","archive_type":"auto_custom"},"contacts":[{"name":"Kenneth R Winfield, Contractor","role":"primary","email":"KENNETH.WINFIELD@VA.GOV","title":"Contract Specialist"}],"base_type":{"code":"o","label":"Solicitation"},"notice_id":"3bd75699c4c742f98ae2fc07bd0fa458","provenance":{"extract":{"url":"https://s3.amazonaws.com/falextracts/Contract%20Opportunities/Archived%20Data/FY2025_archived_opportunities.csv","etag":"\"d47226e3d2c6545974b252e103f82b34-139\"","fetched_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","row_sha256":"41fb03b48d5768462b193099dd38aa3ce17c8cb14b25235ec74124c32fe896ee","last_modified":"2026-09-13T14:49:20Z"},"updated_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","first_seen_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z"},"description":{"text":"36C26025R0041 CON 663-CSI-021 RENOVATE BUILDING 100, 2ND FLOOR IR LAB REPLACEMENT, SEATTLE, WA AMENDMENT 0001","origin":"extract"},"notice_type":{"code":"o","label":"Solicitation"},"schema_version":1,"solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","product_service_code":"Y1DB"},{"dates":{"posted":"2025-01-17","response_deadline":{"raw":"2025-02-13T11:00:00-08:00","utc":"2025-02-13T19:00:00Z","date":"2025-02-13","time":"11:00:00","utc_offset_seconds":-28800}},"links":{"sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/07c64a57d2a44cb1aeaef4c8d412f2ca/view"},"naics":{"codes":["236220"],"primary":"236220"},"title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","agency":{"office":{"code":"36C260","name":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)"},"subtier":{"code":"3600","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"department":{"code":"036","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"office_address":{"zip":"98661","city":"VANCOUVER","state":"WA","country":"USA"},"organization_type":"OFFICE"},"status":{"active":false,"archive_date":"2025-03-15","archive_type":"auto_custom"},"contacts":[{"name":"Kenneth R Winfield, Contractor","role":"primary","email":"KENNETH.WINFIELD@VA.GOV","title":"Contract Specialist"}],"base_type":{"code":"o","label":"Solicitation"},"notice_id":"07c64a57d2a44cb1aeaef4c8d412f2ca","provenance":{"extract":{"url":"https://s3.amazonaws.com/falextracts/Contract%20Opportunities/Archived%20Data/FY2025_archived_opportunities.csv","etag":"\"d47226e3d2c6545974b252e103f82b34-139\"","fetched_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","row_sha256":"e33e7a9f927ddded8ba63747914c2a891b28a6007480be7bb95a996038ca1c5d","last_modified":"2026-09-13T14:49:20Z"},"updated_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","first_seen_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z"},"description":{"text":"36C26025R0041 CON 663-CSI-021 RENOVATE BUILDING 100, 2ND FLOOR IR LAB REPLACEMENT, SEATTLE, WA AMENDMENT 0002 VA RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION 001 THRU 007 RFI 001: General Requirements 1.5 Security Requirements C.1 states, The General Contractor shall provide unarmed guards at the project site 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. A Security Guard in Seattle will cost at least $60 per hour and with overtime / off hours will probably average at least $75 an hour or more. It will cost at least $1,800 per day. The project schedule is 250 days so security will cost around $450,000 for the project. How do you expect us to get the job complete with a budget of $500,000 - $1,000,000 if you want to spend $450,000 on security? Is this really needed? The VA already has VA Police on site. VA RESPONSE: The inclusion of this provision regarding unarmed security was included as part of nationally obligated general requirements. It is the concurrence of the station that there should not be a need for unarmed guards or monitoring devices to be utilized: there may be some communication necessary with the VA Police to develop a simple security plan but on the whole the work site should be able to be adequately secured by standard patient and infection control measures. RFI 002: Section C.2 states, The contractor shall provide unarmed guards and VA Police with communication devices as directed. There are no directions on what to provide the VA Police. How can we adequately price this out without any direction? VA RESPONSE: The inclusion of this provision regarding unarmed security was included as part of nationally obligated general requirements. It is the concurrence of the station that there should not be a need for unarmed guards or monitoring devices to be utilized: there may be some communication necessary with the VA Police to develop a simple security plan but on the whole the work site should be able to be adequately secured by standard patient and infection control measures. RFI 003: Section C.3 states, The general contractor shall install equipment for recording guards rounds to ensure systematic checking of premises. What equipment do you want us to install? How can we adequately price this out without any direction? VA RESPONSE: The inclusion of this provision regarding unarmed security was included as part of nationally obligated general requirements. It is the concurrence of the station that there should not be a need for unarmed guards or monitoring devices to be utilized: there may be some communication necessary with the VA Police to develop a simple security plan but on the whole the work site should be able to be adequately secured by standard patient and infection control measures. RFI 004: General Conditions Page 7 P. states, Coordination of Construction with Cemetery Director This job has nothing to do with a cemetery. Why is this language in the specifications? VA RESPONSE: This was included as part of nationally required general requirements: as bidders may be aware, the VA also handles work on our national cemeteries which this section would obviously pertain to. This language can safely be ignored for this particular project. RFI 005: In reference to the IR Lab Building 100 Renovation, I see metal pan ceilings indicated in spec section 95100, but I did not find anything in the finish schedule or RCP referencing metal ceilings. 1. Can you help me locate where the metal ceilings are in the project? 2. What is the basis of design for the metal ceilings? VA RESPONSE: The metal pan ceilings indicated in section 09 51 00 were included as a general description item: effectively, the section provided the specifications and requirements of what would be meant should the VA have requested Perforated Metal Facing (Pan) . From staff review and personal knowledge of the contract, it is not believed that there are any metal ceilings requested and Section 09 51 00 was actually included for it s relevancy to drop ceilings and acoustic tiling. RFI 006: The requirements for Special Inspections and Testing is very convoluted and inconsistent. Section 01 45 00 Quality Control Page 8 C. states, Government reserves the right to utilize the contractor s control testing laboratory , meaning contractor is paying for testing and inspections. Section 01 45 29 Testing Lab Services 1.1 states, Testing laboratory to be retained by Department of Veterans Affairs. Section 01 45 35 Special Inspections Page 2 E states, Special inspector to be retained by Prime Contractor. Can these discrepancies be cleared up, so we know how to bid this project? VA RESPONSE: Refer to the scope of work for clarification on this matter: The Contractor shall be responsible for all testing and inspection services RFI 007: Spec Section 02 83 33.13 Lead Based Paint / Glazed Component Removal and Disposal list work in Buildings 23, 3, 2, 51, 53 and other areas in Building 1 we are not working in. The scope of work area shown on the drawings is only Building 1 the 2nd Floor IR lab area. It there going to be any Lead Paint Removal in these additional areas in the specifications which are not shown on the drawings? VA RESPONSE: Work is only to occur in Building 100, 2nd Floor IR Lab as described in the drawings.","origin":"extract"},"notice_type":{"code":"o","label":"Solicitation"},"schema_version":1,"solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","product_service_code":"Y1DB"},{"dates":{"posted":"2025-02-12","response_deadline":{"raw":"2025-02-24T11:00:00-08:00","utc":"2025-02-24T19:00:00Z","date":"2025-02-24","time":"11:00:00","utc_offset_seconds":-28800}},"links":{"sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/ba1173d7497445b4801ac8188f01f732/view"},"naics":{"codes":["236220"],"primary":"236220"},"title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","agency":{"office":{"code":"36C260","name":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)"},"subtier":{"code":"3600","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"department":{"code":"036","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"office_address":{"zip":"98661","city":"VANCOUVER","state":"WA","country":"USA"},"organization_type":"OFFICE"},"status":{"active":false,"archive_date":"2025-03-26","archive_type":"auto_custom"},"contacts":[{"name":"Kenneth R Winfield, Contractor","role":"primary","email":"KENNETH.WINFIELD@VA.GOV","title":"Contract Specialist"}],"base_type":{"code":"o","label":"Solicitation"},"notice_id":"ba1173d7497445b4801ac8188f01f732","provenance":{"extract":{"url":"https://s3.amazonaws.com/falextracts/Contract%20Opportunities/Archived%20Data/FY2025_archived_opportunities.csv","etag":"\"d47226e3d2c6545974b252e103f82b34-139\"","fetched_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","row_sha256":"b142d4999fd2a5e9bef92a2d6f7be9012722f5b53be00d51fbf65f8057eb702b","last_modified":"2026-09-13T14:49:20Z"},"updated_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","first_seen_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z"},"description":{"text":"SOLICITATION NO.36C26025R0041 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 663-CSI-021 RENOVATE BUILDING 100, 2ND FLOOR IR LAB REPLACEMENT, VA PUGET SOUND HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, SEATTLE, WA AMENDMENT 0003 - ATTACHMENTS","origin":"extract"},"notice_type":{"code":"o","label":"Solicitation"},"schema_version":1,"solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","product_service_code":"Y1DB"},{"dates":{"posted":"2025-02-14","response_deadline":{"raw":"2025-02-24T11:00:00-08:00","utc":"2025-02-24T19:00:00Z","date":"2025-02-24","time":"11:00:00","utc_offset_seconds":-28800}},"links":{"sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/08a742dabae844e68b53c7d758c28a7a/view"},"naics":{"codes":["236220"],"primary":"236220"},"title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","agency":{"office":{"code":"36C260","name":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)"},"subtier":{"code":"3600","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"department":{"code":"036","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"office_address":{"zip":"98661","city":"VANCOUVER","state":"WA","country":"USA"},"organization_type":"OFFICE"},"status":{"active":false,"archive_date":"2025-03-26","archive_type":"auto_custom"},"contacts":[{"name":"Kenneth R Winfield, Contractor","role":"primary","email":"KENNETH.WINFIELD@VA.GOV","title":"Contract Specialist"}],"base_type":{"code":"o","label":"Solicitation"},"notice_id":"08a742dabae844e68b53c7d758c28a7a","provenance":{"extract":{"url":"https://s3.amazonaws.com/falextracts/Contract%20Opportunities/Archived%20Data/FY2025_archived_opportunities.csv","etag":"\"d47226e3d2c6545974b252e103f82b34-139\"","fetched_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","row_sha256":"7fb00420580020947403a55ed43120233291ba38f3fd54e05a0c894e12192bdd","last_modified":"2026-09-13T14:49:20Z"},"updated_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","first_seen_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z"},"description":{"text":"SOLICITATION NO.36C26025R0041 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 663-CSI-021 RENOVATE BUILDING 100, 2ND FLOOR IR LAB REPLACEMENT, VA PUGET SOUND HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, SEATTLE, WA AMENDMENT 0004 VA RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION 008 THRU 054 Page 2 of 2 8. SOW #4 Specific Tasks states, some activities shall only be performed outside of normal business hours; some activities may be curtailed if they interfere with normal activities, and may be delayed for other times or conditions. Question: What specific activities shall only be performed outside of normal business hours? What is considered outside of normal business hours , evening work, weekend work, or something else? VA RESPONSE: Currently, no work has been specifically slated to occur outside of normal business hours, however, coordination will be occurring with the ward during the execution of the project. Some work may be shifted if it proves disruptive to ward operations, in this case likely being shifted to evening work. Such changes will be evaluated for cost and impact if and when they may arise. 9. SOW Item #4 Specific Tasks states Contractor on-site office or on-site storage / office container shall not be allowed. and Contractor storage area will be limited to their construction site. It then follows with In Seattle, office space will be provided as available in the triple wide trailer at the northeast corner of campus. Questions: Will sufficient office space for 3 fulltime onsite personnel (4 if PM must be stationed at VA Seattle) be available at the triple wide trailer at the northeast corner of campus, yes or no? What should the contractor assume for bidding purposes? VA RESPONSE: VA Seattle will make every effort to make office space available to the contractor. As office space and needs fluctuate with project completion statuses, commitments regarding the trailer can only be made closer to award. In the worst-case scenario, staging space and a desk may be made available within Mechanical Room 12 for use by the contractor. 10. SOW Item #4 Specific Tasks states Contractor on-site office or on-site storage / office container shall not be allowed. and Contractor storage area will be limited to their construction site. It then follows with In Seattle, office space will be provided as available in the triple wide trailer at the northeast corner of campus. As can often be the case and then assuming the VA cannot provide office space for 3 or 4 required onsite personnel, and with an extremely small construction site, where are these 3 or 4 individuals supposed to have their desks to sit and write reports, RFIs, hold meetings, update schedules and as-built drawings, schedule subcontractors and deliveries and perform the general execution of the project? VA RESPONSE: See above RFI Response 9. 11. Would the government please provide all the PPIs and responses from the 1st time this project was solicited as long as the answers are still valid? VA RESPONSE: Each solicitation is a separate acquisition with responses applicable to each. 12. The Specifications contain Section 28 13 00 Physical Access Control System but with a review of the drawings we cannot locate any access control work. Where is the access control work relevant to 23 13 00 or why is this specification section included in the bid documents? VA RESPONSE: The specification section was included in the bid documents due to the work to be completed on the lead lined doors to the hallway, however, to the best of our review it seems no access control work is requested on this specific project. 13. RFP Page 69 of 80, Factor 2, Bullet 4 says to provide the Percentage of time dedicated to the project. Questions: 1) What, if any, are the minimum percentage of time dedicated to the project requirements for the Project Manager, Superintendent, QC Manager, and SSHO? 2) What is the definition of dedicated to the project? Does this mean mandatory onsite only or does off-site main office work count too? Please clarify. VA RESPONSE: Percentage of time for each, no minimum was requested. Dedicated time is for all work associated to a project. RFP Page 69 of 80, Factor 2, Bullet 4 says to provide the Percentage of time dedicated to the project. Questions: 1) How are these percentages of time being evaluated to determine proposal acceptance? and 2) Should there a staffing requirement and we just stick to the contact requirements on staffing? Why are we providing this? VA RESPONSE: Percentage of time for each, no minimum was requested. Dedicated time is for all work associated to a project. 14. Amendment 2, RFI-006 Response directs us to Refer to the scope of work for clarification on this matter: The Contractor shall be responsible for all testing and inspection services VA RESPONSE: The Statement of Work, Section 4, Testing says The Contractor shall be responsible for all testing and inspection services as stated in the Specifications. [underline added] So we re to adhere to the specifications per the response, but the specifications are still in conflict between differing specification sections as stated in the original RFI-006 question. Can the government give clear direction on what we re to do about the conflicting testing responsibilities within the specifications? In light of the scope of work: any time the bidder feels there is a conflict in testing responsibilities, assume that it will be the bidder responsible for these costs and plan accordingly. 15. SOW Section 10, 5. Says Provide uniform heat detection in the area of work, connected to the existing supervised building master fire alarm system, for the duration of the work whenever the: Ceiling tiles are removed, or sprinkler system is disabled. VA RESPONSE: The ceiling tiles will be removed, and the sprinklers will be shut down as part of this project. How and where will any temporary, uniform heat detection be connected to the existing supervised master fire alarm system? What are the uniform heat detection requirements? Refer to 01 35 26, Section 1.17 Fire Safety for further details. Coordination with site safety personnel will occur as part of any pre-construction process and tie-in monitoring may be arranged, however, assume manual fire observation and control standards to occur as expected by OSHA standards. 16. What contamination and hazardous materials are present within the existing medical equipment that is scheduled for removal and disposal by the contractor? May the existing medical equipment simply be taken to a general landfill? VA RESPONSE: To the best of our knowledge, no hazardous materials are present in the existing medical equipment slated for removal and disposal. We are partnered alongside Siemens Healthcare for the purchase of new equipment; it may be possible to coordinate disposal of the old hardware with them as well. 17. Understanding Bldg. 100 was built some time ago; will the VA provide a hazardous materials survey pre-bid or post-award for this project or is it the responsibility of the contractor to perform the pre-demolition hazmat survey and subsequent reports for worker safety? VA RESPONSE: Hazardous material survey was provided on 1/29/2025. 18. Does the existing floor meet the levelness requirements for the new medical equipment and if not, how far is it out of compliance? How much will the existing floor need to be re-leveled? Or does the new equipment have self-leveling capabilities and we don t need to re-level the floor? VA RESPONSE: The equipment requirements sheet was uploaded 1/29/2025 as part of the resource packet; the floor levelness must not exceed 5/16 over the run of the equipment table. Unfortunately, patient procedures occurring within the room prevented a measurement from being taken. 19. AD102, Keynote 4, states to reinstall ceiling and Unistrut systems. A plan callout on Sheet AC101says to re-install the Unistrut but to install new ceiling grid and tile. Are we re-installing the ceiling system or replacing it with new? VA RESPONSE: The Unistrut system is confirmed to be re-installed. The ceiling system may be evaluated for re-cycling during the teardown process but assume it is to be replaced with new. 20. Does the VA require the entire existing ACT ceiling system be replaced wall-to-wall including the existing wall angles or just where it s necessary for structural and lighting upgrades? VA RESPONSE: Due to the work required above the existing ACT ceiling system, it is recommended that it be replaced wall-to-wall as depicted so as to avoid potential damages when conducting other work, such as adjusting fire systems or the mounting of the new imaging hardware. 21. Will the structural and other upgrades at the ceiling result in a different ceiling elevation or will we be able to keep the exact ceiling height as exists now? If different, will it be higher or lower? VA RESPONSE: Due to patient procedures ongoing in the suite, the current ceiling height could not be verified due to ongoing patient procedures. It is known that the ceiling height requirement for the new imaging hardware is 8 11 , which is believed to be the height of the current ceiling. 22. Specification Section 02 83 33.13 Lead-Based Paint/Glazed Component Removal and Disposal, §1.1, A. provides a list of buildings (1, 2, 3, 23, 51, 52, 53) noting the presence of lead. Building 100 is not listed. Please confirm this specification section does not apply to this project and if it does, explain why and where we re to apply this section. VA RESPONSE: Hazardous material survey does not indicate the presence of either asbestos or lead containing materials. This section therefore does not directly apply to this project but was included out of an abundance of caution. 23. Specification Section 02 83 33.13 Lead-Based Paint/Glazed Component Removal and Disposal, §1.1, A. provides a list of buildings (1, 2, 3, 23, 51, 52, 53) noting the presence of lead. Building 100 is not listed. Please confirm that this specification section does not apply to this project or why it does apply including the requirement for a Lead Based Paint Removal Negative Exposure Assessment Study/Development in paragraph 4. VA RESPONSE: Hazardous material survey does not indicate the presence of either asbestos or lead containing materials. This section therefore does not directly apply to this project but was included out of an abundance of caution. 24. Sheet A-501, General Note 3, states that lead is not require in the door head when it s only required in walls to a 7 height. Other than the Door and Frame, is there any other lead lining necessary by the contractor and if so, where and to what extent? VA RESPONSE: As written, there is currently no lead lining required to be installed by the contractor on this project. 25. An RFI response from the previous canceled solicitation dictated that the contractor was to review the Lead Shielding Design from Corwin. What is the Lead Shielding Design from Corwin? Does this Corwin design apply to this project? Will the VA provide it pre-bid or is it no longer relevant? VA RESPONSE: The Corwin Shielding Report was included as part of the resource documents package on 1/29/2025. 26. Detail 1, Sheet A-501 shows partition framing at the door. This detail appears to support a 3 wide door. Does it apply to the new 6 wide, double-leaf lead-lined door or is there another more appropriate detail? VA RESPONSE: No other framing detail exists. 27. During the pre-bid site visit, access was not provided into any interstitial spaces above the project s Rm. 2D-117. What are the access limitations, floor to ceiling heights, congestion challenges in the interstitial space as shown on Sheets MD101, M-102, and M-103? Can the VA provide photographs of the interstitial space? VA RESPONSE: During the tour, access to the interstitial space was provided via the electrical closet. There is also an access doorway to the interstitial space available via the stairwell this door is approximately the same, standard 4 x7 doorway located throughout the hospital. Crossbeams routinely drop overhead clearance to 5 , and ducting and piping run regularly near and underfoot. Mobility is ultimately reduced but manageable. Unfortunately, the VA cannot provide additional photographs of the space at this time as it is not well understood what would be most helpful to the bidders. 28. During the pre-bid site visit, access could not be provided to Substation B . Will the government provide photographs of the work areas in and around Substation B ? VA RESPONSE: Unfortunately, current ongoing work limits access to Substation B. While this is expected to be resolved before the anticipated construction date for this project, pictures of Substation B cannot currently be provided. 29. What are the current approved building fire suppression, fire alarm, and HVAC Digital Controls companies? VA RESPONSE: HurtVet is the current contractor for fire alarm and suppression. ATS is the current contractor for HVAC Digital Controls. 30. The Specialty Equipment Schedule on Sheet A-601 lists a Nitrogen Control Cabinet as the contactors responsibility to both provide and install. Is the contractor to actually provide and install this? We re unable to find the specifications for this control cabinet. If we re to provide and install, can the government provide the Nitrogen Control Cabinet specifications? VA RESPONSE: The nitrogen control cabinet was included as a placeholder from a technical information library. We have coordinated with the clinical team and confirmed that no such device is actually required for installation in the room. 31. If the contractor is to provide and install a Nitrogen Control Cabinet as shown in the A-601 Specialty Equipment Schedule we cannot find any construction details. Are there any wall demolition, lead lining, piping, cabling, or other design for the cabinet installation? VA RESPONSE: The nitrogen control cabinet was included as a placeholder from a technical information library. We have coordinated with the clinical team and confirmed that no such device is actually required for installation in the room. 32. A-601 Specialty Equipment Schedule has the contractor providing and installing a Nitrogen Control Cabinet. That we can tell, this cabinet is only shown in the drawings in west elevation view 4/AE421 where its location appears to be in conflict with all the imaging equipment noted in Keynote 1 on Sheets EP101, ET101, and EP401. Is the imaging equipment portable and moves about the room or stationery where a conflict would occur? VA RESPONSE: The nitrogen control cabinet will be mounted to the wall whereas the imaging equipment depicted is a mobile cart of monitors; there should be no conflict between the two. 33. RFI - My electrician is asking which distribution gear is supplied by the owner? One example would be the UPS. VA RESPONSE: The VA is unsure of the exact extent of this question; as part of the Siemens equipment package, the VA will be suppling the items in the UPS as well as the cabling listed in the table of E-503 as Siemen Supplied Cables . Additionally on E-503, the Contractor Supplied Cables represents a partial list of the gear required for the instillation of the imaging equipment specifically within the procedure room. 34. Drawings and PACS: At this time, it has been determined that there is not a need for the instillation of any physical access control system work, including either of the depicted combination card and keypad readers on the electrical sheets. As such, we do not believe any of the Physical Access Control PACs questions submitted are relevant to the specifics of this project. VA RESPONSE: Spec Section 28 13 00 Physical Access Control PACs 35. Is this project an extension of the existing VA Andover FIPS201 Continuum PACS system? VA RESPONSE: Any PACS work would be a continuation of the existing PACS system within the hospital. However, there is no planned PACs work. 36. Will new Security panel communicate to the existing VA Continuum server via a VA provided network connection? VA RESPONSE: Not relevant to project. 37. Will the project require any SMS Continuum security software Licenses? If yes how many. VA RESPONSE: No. 38. Will this project require a new PACs server? If yes, please clarify. VA RESPONSE: No. 39. Will the project require a new Continuum security workstation? No. VA RESPONSE: If yes how many. N/A. 40. Door hardware group specification 08 71 00; will electrified door hardware and required power supplies be provided and installed by Division 8 for all card reader doors? VA RESPONSE: No electrified hardware expected at this time. 41. Does the PACS system need to interface with the fire alarm system? VA RESPONSE: Not relevant. 42. Will a dedicated 120-volt power circuit be provided at any new security panel? VA RESPONSE: Not relevant. 43. IDS system interface, does the SMS need to interface with the IDS system? If yes, please provide the make and model of the system at each location. VA RESPONSE: Unknown acronyms. Likely not relevant due to lack of PACS work 44. Security Access Detection interface, does the SMS need to interface with the SAD system? If yes, please provide the make and model of the system at each location. VA RESPONSE: No. 45. EPPS interface, does the SMS need to interface with the EPPS system? If yes, please provide the make and model of the system at each location. VA RESPONSE: No. 46. Visitor management system does the SMS need to interface with a VMS system. If yes, please provide the make and model of the system at each location. VA RESPONSE: No. 47. Time and attendance system does the SMS need to interface with a TaA system? If yes, please provide the make and model of the system at each location. VA RESPONSE: No. 48. Real Time Guard Tour does the SMS need to interface with a RTGT system? If yes, please provide the make and model of the system and each location. VA RESPONSE: No. 49. Elevator interface does the SMS need to interface with an elevator or system? If yes, please provide the make and model of the system and each location. VA RESPONSE: No. 50. Is the door that has the keypad symbol going to receive a Combo Keypad/Card Reader. VA RESPONSE: At this time, no keypad/readers are expected to be installed. 51. Is the back door (in corridor 2D-160 Door S2.134) going to also get a Combo Keypad/Card Reader? Please advise. VA RESPONSE: Both doors are depicted receiving keypad/readers. However, it has been determined that neither should actually receive said readers. 52. If the back door (in corridor 2D-160 Door S2.134) gets a Combo Keypad/Card Reader will in be required to interface with the Intercommunications system that is existing to lock or unlock the door? If yes, please provide the make and model of the system at each location. VA RESPONSE: No readers to be installed. 53. Intercommunications System Interface, does the SMS need to interface with the Intercommunications System? If yes, please provide the make and model of the system at each location. VA RESPONSE: No. 54. HVAC Controls System Interface, does the SMS need to interface with the HVAC controls system? If yes, please provide the make and model of the system at each location. VA RESPONSE: No.","origin":"extract"},"notice_type":{"code":"o","label":"Solicitation"},"schema_version":1,"solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","product_service_code":"Y1DB"},{"dates":{"posted":"2025-02-20","response_deadline":{"raw":"2025-02-28T11:00:00-08:00","utc":"2025-02-28T19:00:00Z","date":"2025-02-28","time":"11:00:00","utc_offset_seconds":-28800}},"links":{"sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/e69af3c322574f5192761816b94973ed/view"},"naics":{"codes":["236220"],"primary":"236220"},"title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","agency":{"office":{"code":"36C260","name":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)"},"subtier":{"code":"3600","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"department":{"code":"036","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"office_address":{"zip":"98661","city":"VANCOUVER","state":"WA","country":"USA"},"organization_type":"OFFICE"},"status":{"active":false,"archive_date":"2025-03-30","archive_type":"auto_custom"},"contacts":[{"name":"Kenneth R Winfield, Contractor","role":"primary","email":"KENNETH.WINFIELD@VA.GOV","title":"Contract Specialist"}],"base_type":{"code":"o","label":"Solicitation"},"notice_id":"e69af3c322574f5192761816b94973ed","provenance":{"extract":{"url":"https://s3.amazonaws.com/falextracts/Contract%20Opportunities/Archived%20Data/FY2025_archived_opportunities.csv","etag":"\"d47226e3d2c6545974b252e103f82b34-139\"","fetched_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","row_sha256":"99c831c21c0497a305a8dd2668acc2d579801b7d64e4374822a65e61d1385144","last_modified":"2026-09-13T14:49:20Z"},"updated_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","first_seen_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z"},"description":{"text":"SOLICITATION NO.36C26025R0041 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 663-CSI-021 RENOVATE BUILDING 100, 2ND FLOOR IR LAB REPLACEMENT, VAPSHCS, SEATTLE, WA AMENDMENT 0005 VA RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION 055 THRU 078 Drawing A-601, Wall Schedule only depicts one wall type #2. This wall is drawn without acoustical insulation. Will the VA confirm that all new walls are to be constructed without insulation? VA RESPONSE: The wall type depicted should be sufficient for the needs of this project. Drawing AE421, Elevation #4 depicts new upper and lower cabinets with a countertop. There are no keynotes nor floorplan references, or finish Specifications in Section 09 06 00. Will the VA provide clear directions if these cabinets / countertops are to be fabricated and installed for this project? If so, will the VA provide material / fabrication instructions and specifications for these cabinets? VA RESPONSE: AE421 depicts cabinets, true, but these are existing fixtures within the clinical space and not new construction. Drawing AE421, Elevation #4 depicts new upper and lower cabinets with a countertop. At the lower left of the base cabinets there appears either a tall cabinet door or possibly and under the counter refrigerator. If this is a refrigerator, this does not appear on the equipment schedule, and there is no responsibility matrix for who may be supplying and installing this equipment. Will the VA clarify what this cabinet / unit is supposed to be and if a refrigerator, specifications, and who supplies and installs it? VA RESPONSE: This does not depict a refrigerator; this depicts existing cabinets and countertops already in the clinical space. They are not slated for removal or replacement. The Specifications contain Section 28 13 00 Physical Access Control System. Drawing A-601 does not depict any access control in the Door Schedule or details. Will the VA confirm no Physical Access Control work is required for this project? VA RESPONSE: There will be no PACs work required for this project. Drawing A-601, Door Schedule does not depict a hardware set for door #134. Will the VA provide the information required for this hardware set? VA RESPONSE: The following hardware schedule has been utilized recently elsewhere in the radiology department: 2 Heavy Duty Floor Closer Set: RIXON L27-180 (1500 LBS) WEIGHT CAPACITY 2 Intermediate Pivots: RIXON ML19 1 Set Auto Flush Bolts: TYPE 25 LESS BOTTOM BOLT x LEAD-LINED 1 Classroom Lock: F08 x LEAD-LINED x PADDLES POINTING DOWN SCHLAGE HL6-9070-US626-L-E6 1 Un-combinated Core: SCHLAGE EVEREST 80-036 626 R124 SFIC 7-PIN 1 Coordinator: Type 21A 2 Armor Plates: J101 x 1.275 MM (0.050 INCH) THICKNESS 4 Edge Guard (@ Wood Doors): J208M / J211 (VERIFY), CUT: HARDWARE 2 Floor Stops: L02121 x 3 FASTENERS 1 Set Self-Adhesive Seals: R0Y154 While not anticipated, minor adjustments to this hardware list may occur in order to match doors located along the same corridor. Drawing AS101 depicts the controlled work areas covered by the ICRA containment. During the Site Visit, VA staff were observed moving through the future controlled area for work tasks. Will VA staff require access through the controlled areas during the construction?  If so, will the VA be considering a revised phased approach for the project to allow continuous access to these areas for VA staff? VA RESPONSE: We have been informed by the ward that direct access between the hall 2D-162 and control room 2D-115B will be necessary for staff to maintain sterile scrubs for procedures. As such, we may be considering a revised phased approach or alternate arrangement of the ICRA barrier so as to leave a path available to VA staff, with a slight preference for simply altering the ICRA barrier plan. The SOW, page 5 states that the working hours for this project will be 5:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Mon-Fri. During the Site Visit, night shift work was mentioned. Since night work is typically a premium wage rate differential, will the VA confirm this project will be performed from 5:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.? If not, will the VA describe specifically what work must be performed after-hours or on weekends? VA RESPONSE: The VA can confirm that regular work hours are to be between 5AM and 2PM Mon-Fri, however, construction shall occur in coordination with the radiology clinic. While no night work is currently arranged or anticipated, if the clinic feels that regular patient care is being disrupted or affected by some aspect of the work, there may come a time when night work or off hours work enters the discussion. Such changes will be evaluated for cost and impact if and when they may arise. Neither the drawings nor the Specifications mention asbestos containing materials. Past projects have indicated existing flooring materials were ACM and this area does not seem to have been recently renovated. Will the VA provide the current Hazardous Material Survey for this area and if ACM is indicated, provide the requisite specification sections for any abatement required? VA RESPONSE: A/E Asbestos survey provided in the resource documents given to contract 1/29/2025. No ACM was detected within the project area. The electrical drawings call out for the UPS location to be coordinated with the COR for placement location inside ME12. This room is @80 long. Will the VA provide a more accurate location on the drawings to allow for an accurate bid price? VA RESPONSE: Due to other ongoing work in MER12, there is currently not an exact plan for the placement of the UPS. A more accurate location will be determined during the pre-construction coordination phase; in the meantime, it is advised to bid as if targeting the location depicted. Specification Section 01 00 00, Part 1.3-B states that the existing imaging equipment should be removed and new imaging equipment installed. Will the VA confirm that the new imaging equipment will be installed by the VA vendor after the Contractor prepares the area and that this installation will not be the responsibility of the Contractor? Will the VA clarify if the VA Vendor will also remove the existing equipment? VA RESPONSE: New imaging equipment will be provided and installed by Siemens. The contractor will be responsible for the removal and disposal of the old equipment. Specification Section 01 00 00, Part 1.5-C requires the Contractor to employ unarmed guards at the site 24/7. Will the VA clarify if this be a requirement for this project? VA RESPONSE: These requirements were included based on national standards; on reviewing local project conditions, we agree that requiring unarmed guards for this project is in excess. Specification Section 01 00 00, Part 1.6-I Phasing seems to be for a different project and mentions room numbers and work not depicted on the drawings for this project. Will the VA provide a phasing narrative that applies to this project and confirm the work currently described is incorrect? VA RESPONSE: Phasing information was corrected in the specifications provided 1/29/2025. Specification Section 01 00 00, Part 1.6-P describes operations in a cemetery. Will the VA confirm this is not applicable for this project? VA RESPONSE: VA confirms that cemetery work is not applicable to this project. Specification Section 01 00 00, Part 1.28 requires the Contractor to provide 50 sf of remodeled space in the building, with fire suppression and HVAC for VA storage purposes. If this will be required for this project, will the VA provide construction drawings depicting the location and the work to be performed for this VA storage space? VA RESPONSE: The requirement essentially states 50 square feet of [storage] space , not remodeled space as suggested in this RFI. For example, this could mean a storage container, work trailer, or other plan for a secured lay down space. Essentially, plan for the reasonable costs of leaving some contractor equipment secured and onsite throughout construction with the worst case being that this storage space will be somewhere on the campus at ground level, such as a cordoned off area of the parking lot. Please bear in mind that while such space is recommended as part of the budgeting estimate, the VA can make no guarantees for any space or storage availability on campus. Any actual discussion of lay down and storage space will occur during early coordination meetings after contract award. Will the VA clarify if the Site Superintendent, if duly qualified, may also serve in the roles of the SSHO and CQC or will the VA require a separate individual for either of those two roles? VA RESPONSE: The project manager and site superintendent must be separate roles. The SSHO and CQC may be the same individual but also cannot be shared with the site superintendent or project manager roles. Specification Section 01 45 00, Part 3.4-A & C requires the Contractor to retain additional specialized individuals who must be present at all times during work in these individual s specific area of responsibility. For this project, this requirement would mean the Contractor must retain a Structural Engineer, an Architect (or Const. Professional with 5 years experience), a Mechanical Engineer, an Electrical Engineer, and an Environmental Engineer, all to be present onsite during activities in their respective areas of responsibility. Since the hiring all of these Architects/Engineers, and having them onsite during any work taking place in their respective areas of expertise, will add significantly high costs to this project, will the VA clarify whether this will be a requirement for this project? VA RESPONSE: The expected requirements of the VA are more closely illustrated in the table listed in Section 01 45 00, Part 3.4 C: we anticipate needing a mechanical, electrical, and structural engineer as well as a submittal clerk and materials technician. A single individual can cover multiple of these roles provided sufficient experience. Specification Section 01 45 29, Part 1.1 states that the VA will retain the Testing Laboratory. Will the VA clarify if the Contractor or the VA will hire the Testing Laboratory? VA RESPONSE: Per the overall text of 01 45 29, the VA will retain a testing laboratory for any services listed within this specification section. Specification Section 01 91 00 General Commissioning, Part 1.8-C states that the VA will retain the Commissioning Agent under a sperate contract. Will the VA clarify if formal Commissioning will be required for this project and if so, whether the VA or the Contractor will retain the Commissioning Agent? VA RESPONSE: As per the specifications, a commissioning agent will be retained by the VA under a separate contract. At this time, it is known that some elements will require formal commissioning in order to eventually allow certification of the refurbished clinical space, such as the start-up and commissioning of the new imaging equipment. Unless otherwise noted by the scope of work or specifications, such commissioning will be handled by the VA or be otherwise renegotiated with the contractor if and when it should arise. 74. Specs & Amendment 1 Specs: - Section 019100 Part 3.1 Commissioning Process Roles & Responsibilities table cut off - missing Sections 130541, 226200, 226300, 230541 & 232541 VA RESPONSE: As stated above, these items are addressed by the fixed specifications sent to Contracting 1/29/2025. 75. There is a mention of Liquidated Damages for Data Breach RFP Page 62 & 63 of Are there Liquidated Damages for the construction contract? VA RESPONSE: NO. 76. Table of Contents 00 01 00 1. 01 91 00 General Commissioning Requirements Missing Specification pages 19-34 & 39. Cropped Specification pages 35, 36, 37, 38. There are 17 less pages in the Specification than listed in the Table of Contents. Four pages are cropped off and information is missing. Please provide the missing specification documents. Please provide uncropped specification pages. VA RESPONSE: Previously answered; corrected specs. 77. Table of Contents 00 01 00 2 lists these sections but there are No Documents to match the Table of Contents listing. 13 05 41 No documents in the Specifications. 22 26 00 No Documents in the Specifications. 22 63 00 No documents in the Specifications. 23 05 41 No documents in the Specifications. 23 25 41 No documents in the Specifications. Please provide the missing specification documents. VA RESPONSE: Previously answered; corrected specs. 78. RFP pg. 2- of 80 Representatives and Certifications. Reads: (c) If the offeror checked \"has\" in paragraph (b) of this provision, the offeror represents, by submission of this offer, that the information it has entered in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) is current, accurate, and complete It is our understanding that the FAPIIS is integrated with System for Award Management (SAM.gov). Will this section of the RFP be reissued referencing the current SAM information? VA RESPONSE: No. Acknowledged FAPIIS is integrated with System for Award Management SAM.gov, however, Contracting Officers are not allowed to change clause(s) structure.","origin":"extract"},"notice_type":{"code":"o","label":"Solicitation"},"schema_version":1,"solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","product_service_code":"Y1DB"},{"dates":{"posted":"2025-02-21","response_deadline":{"raw":"2025-02-28T11:00:00-08:00","utc":"2025-02-28T19:00:00Z","date":"2025-02-28","time":"11:00:00","utc_offset_seconds":-28800}},"links":{"sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/255415842e1c45d2aa6240d676606534/view"},"naics":{"codes":["236220"],"primary":"236220"},"title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","agency":{"office":{"code":"36C260","name":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)"},"subtier":{"code":"3600","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"department":{"code":"036","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"office_address":{"zip":"98661","city":"VANCOUVER","state":"WA","country":"USA"},"organization_type":"OFFICE"},"status":{"active":false,"archive_date":"2025-03-30","archive_type":"auto_custom"},"contacts":[{"name":"Kenneth R Winfield, Contractor","role":"primary","email":"KENNETH.WINFIELD@VA.GOV","title":"Contract Specialist"}],"base_type":{"code":"o","label":"Solicitation"},"notice_id":"255415842e1c45d2aa6240d676606534","provenance":{"extract":{"url":"https://s3.amazonaws.com/falextracts/Contract%20Opportunities/Archived%20Data/FY2025_archived_opportunities.csv","etag":"\"d47226e3d2c6545974b252e103f82b34-139\"","fetched_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","row_sha256":"b1f42cff91ab6e46c4b43acf6a6039b6cbc95d116d445b7c94b70d131730ca57","last_modified":"2026-09-13T14:49:20Z"},"updated_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","first_seen_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z"},"description":{"text":"CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 663-CSI-021 RENOVATE BUILDING 100, 2ND FLOOR IR LAB REPLACEMENT, VAPSHCS, SEATTLE, WA SOLICITATION NO.36C26025R0041 AMENDMENT 0006","origin":"extract"},"notice_type":{"code":"o","label":"Solicitation"},"schema_version":1,"solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","product_service_code":"Y1DB"},{"dates":{"posted":"2025-06-09","response_deadline":{"raw":"2025-06-11","date":"2025-06-11"}},"links":{"sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/040cf0940fb345248425257a7b85d74d/view"},"naics":{"codes":["236220"],"primary":"236220"},"title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","agency":{"office":{"code":"36C260","name":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)"},"subtier":{"code":"3600","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"department":{"code":"036","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"office_address":{"zip":"98661","city":"VANCOUVER","state":"WA","country":"USA"},"organization_type":"OFFICE"},"status":{"active":false,"archive_date":"2025-06-26","archive_type":"auto15"},"contacts":[{"name":"Kenneth R Winfield, Contractor","role":"primary","email":"KENNETH.WINFIELD@VA.GOV","title":"Contract Specialist"}],"base_type":{"code":"o","label":"Solicitation"},"notice_id":"040cf0940fb345248425257a7b85d74d","provenance":{"extract":{"url":"https://s3.amazonaws.com/falextracts/Contract%20Opportunities/Archived%20Data/FY2025_archived_opportunities.csv","etag":"\"d47226e3d2c6545974b252e103f82b34-139\"","fetched_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","row_sha256":"e308d3531cad5529a0a7840c58ed79375efdaa2846fec50f486343042332eba8","last_modified":"2026-09-13T14:49:20Z"},"updated_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","first_seen_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z"},"description":{"text":"CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 663-CSI-021 RENOVATE BUILDING 100, 2ND FLOOR IR LAB REPLACEMENT, VAPSHCS, SEATTLE, WA SOLICITATION NO.36C26025R0041 AMENDMENT 0006","origin":"extract"},"notice_type":{"code":"o","label":"Solicitation"},"schema_version":1,"solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","product_service_code":"Y1DB"},{"dates":{"posted":"2025-06-09","response_deadline":{"raw":"2025-06-11T15:00:00-07:00","utc":"2025-06-11T22:00:00Z","date":"2025-06-11","time":"15:00:00","utc_offset_seconds":-25200}},"links":{"sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/eb608d51de5a44bdbca363a959775031/view"},"naics":{"codes":["236220"],"primary":"236220"},"title":"Y1DB--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab(Tier 1) VA Pugent Sound Health Care - Seattle Division Seattle, WA","agency":{"office":{"code":"36C260","name":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)"},"subtier":{"code":"3600","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"department":{"code":"036","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"office_address":{"zip":"98661","city":"VANCOUVER","state":"WA","country":"USA"},"organization_type":"OFFICE"},"status":{"active":false,"archive_date":"2025-06-26","archive_type":"auto15"},"contacts":[{"name":"Kenneth R Winfield, Contractor","role":"primary","email":"KENNETH.WINFIELD@VA.GOV","title":"Contract Specialist"}],"base_type":{"code":"o","label":"Solicitation"},"notice_id":"eb608d51de5a44bdbca363a959775031","provenance":{"extract":{"url":"https://s3.amazonaws.com/falextracts/Contract%20Opportunities/Archived%20Data/FY2025_archived_opportunities.csv","etag":"\"d47226e3d2c6545974b252e103f82b34-139\"","fetched_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","row_sha256":"9f2777e7fb4409a10139b542763341fe96fec22f7b5b4e9a0b10bf9f6a1e5978","last_modified":"2026-09-13T14:49:20Z"},"updated_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","first_seen_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z"},"description":{"text":"CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 663-CSI-021 RENOVATE BUILDING 100, 2ND FLOOR IR LAB REPLACEMENT, VAPSHCS, SEATTLE, WA SOLICITATION NO.36C26025R0041 AMENDMENT 0006","origin":"extract"},"notice_type":{"code":"o","label":"Solicitation"},"schema_version":1,"solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","product_service_code":"Y1DB"},{"award":{"date":"2025-09-09","amount":"1328499.00","number":"36C26025C0035","awardee":{"raw":"SKYTEK LLC VANCOUVER 98665","name":"SKYTEK LLC VANCOUVER 98665"}},"dates":{"posted":"2025-09-19","award_date":"2025-09-09"},"links":{"sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/35cf48ca06f7479693dfc00a17c725f9/view"},"naics":{"codes":["236220"],"primary":"236220"},"title":"Y1DA--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab","agency":{"office":{"code":"36C260","name":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)"},"subtier":{"code":"3600","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"department":{"code":"036","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"office_address":{"zip":"98661","city":"VANCOUVER","state":"WA","country":"USA"},"organization_type":"OFFICE"},"status":{"active":false,"archive_date":"2025-10-19","archive_type":"auto_custom"},"contacts":[{"name":"Dennis Einarson","role":"primary","email":"dennis.einarson@va.gov","phone":"3608529884","title":"Contracting Officer"}],"base_type":{"code":"a","label":"Award Notice"},"notice_id":"35cf48ca06f7479693dfc00a17c725f9","set_aside":{"code":"SDVOSBC","label":"Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Set-Aside (FAR 19.14)"},"provenance":{"extract":{"url":"https://s3.amazonaws.com/falextracts/Contract%20Opportunities/Archived%20Data/FY2025_archived_opportunities.csv","etag":"\"d47226e3d2c6545974b252e103f82b34-139\"","fetched_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","row_sha256":"96d6b177df5673aaa44895c0d12e390f9518f61da7d4be65ae350978ea28cbfb","last_modified":"2026-09-13T14:49:20Z"},"updated_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","first_seen_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z"},"notice_type":{"code":"a","label":"Award Notice"},"schema_version":1,"solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","product_service_code":"Y1DA"},{"award":{"date":"2025-09-09","amount":"1399994.00","number":"36C26025C0035","awardee":{"raw":"SKYTEK LLC VANCOUVER 98665","name":"SKYTEK LLC VANCOUVER 98665"}},"dates":{"posted":"2025-09-19","award_date":"2025-09-09"},"links":{"sam":"https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/423bc94ba5064664a059d537bcc4dc14/view"},"naics":{"codes":["236220"],"primary":"236220"},"title":"Y1DA--CON 663-CSI-021 Renovation Bldg-100 for IR Lab","agency":{"office":{"code":"36C260","name":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)"},"subtier":{"code":"3600","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"department":{"code":"036","name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF"},"office_address":{"zip":"98661","city":"VANCOUVER","state":"WA","country":"USA"},"organization_type":"OFFICE"},"status":{"active":false,"archive_date":"2025-10-19","archive_type":"auto_custom"},"contacts":[{"name":"Dennis Einarson","role":"primary","email":"dennis.einarson@va.gov","phone":"3608529884","title":"Contracting Officer"}],"base_type":{"code":"a","label":"Award Notice"},"notice_id":"423bc94ba5064664a059d537bcc4dc14","set_aside":{"code":"SDVOSBC","label":"Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Set-Aside (FAR 19.14)"},"provenance":{"extract":{"url":"https://s3.amazonaws.com/falextracts/Contract%20Opportunities/Archived%20Data/FY2025_archived_opportunities.csv","etag":"\"d47226e3d2c6545974b252e103f82b34-139\"","fetched_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","row_sha256":"bd099e39587901f8740a58b29eba7cd651d151dfb2b6917749d9d8fea3c79e50","last_modified":"2026-09-13T14:49:20Z"},"updated_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z","first_seen_at":"2026-09-16T17:45:50.850439Z"},"notice_type":{"code":"a","label":"Award Notice"},"schema_version":1,"solicitation_number":"36C26025R0041","product_service_code":"Y1DA"}],"due_at":"2025-06-11T22:00:00Z","due_date":"2025-06-11","closes_at":"2025-06-11T22:00:00Z","awardable":false,"dept_key":"d-036","dept_name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF","sub_key":"s-3600","sub_name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF","office_key":"o-36C260","office_name":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)","state":"WA","county":"53033","county_name":"King County","city":"5363000","city_name":"Seattle","country":"USA","winner_key":"ZJ5TDRYAP9P8","amount":"1399994.00","linked_awards":12,"cancelled":false,"archived":false,"updated_at":"2026-09-16T21:18:12.857524Z","principal_notice_id":"eb608d51de5a44bdbca363a959775031","description":{"text":"CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 663-CSI-021 RENOVATE BUILDING 100, 2ND FLOOR IR LAB REPLACEMENT, VAPSHCS, SEATTLE, WA SOLICITATION NO.36C26025R0041 AMENDMENT 0006","html":null,"origin":"extract"},"contacts":[{"name":"Dennis Einarson","role":"primary","email":"dennis.einarson@va.gov","phone":"3608529884","title":"Contracting Officer"}],"place_of_performance":null,"office_address":{"zip":"98661","city":"VANCOUVER","state":"WA","country":"USA"},"naics_codes":["236220"],"award":null,"attachments":[],"awards":[{"award_key":"CONT_AWD_36C26025C0035_3600_-NONE-_-NONE-","permalink":"https://www.usaspending.gov/award/CONT_AWD_36C26025C0035_3600_-NONE-_-NONE-/","piid":"36C26025C0035","parent_piid":null,"award_type":"DEFINITIVE CONTRACT","vendor_key":"ZJ5TDRYAP9P8","recipient_name":"SKYTEK LLC","recipient_uei":"ZJ5TDRYAP9P8","recipient_cage":"5G2S9","recipient_city":"VANCOUVER","recipient_state":"WA","sub_name":"Department of Veterans Affairs","office_name":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)","office_key":"o-36C260","first_action_date":"2025-09-19","last_action_date":"2026-03-30","actions":2,"obligated":"1399994.00","current_total_value":"1399994.00","potential_total_value":"1399994.00","naics":"236220","psc":"Y1DA","extent_competed":"FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES","set_aside":"SERVICE DISABLED VETERAN OWNED SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE","offers_received":2,"description":"663-CSI-021 RENOVATION BLDG-100 FOR IR LAB","method":"piid","confidence":"high","evidence":["award number 36C26025C0035 equals the contract number","same awarding office 36C260"],"opportunity_key":null,"opportunity_title":null}],"related":[{"key":"36C26026Q1006","latest_notice_id":"5291cd257569454082dc9016fb638bf6","title":"VISN 5 Optical Fabrication Laboratory Lens Production Machines","solicitation_number":"36C26026Q1006","notice_type":"k","first_type":"k","first_posted":"2026-09-03","last_posted":"2026-09-03","notices":1,"due_at":"2026-09-17T21:00:00Z","due_date":"2026-09-17","closes_at":"2026-09-17T21:00:00Z","awardable":true,"open":true,"dept_key":"d-036","dept_name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF","sub_key":"s-3600","sub_name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF","office_key":"o-36C260","office_name":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)","naics":"339115","psc":"6540","set_aside":null,"state":"ID","county":"16001","county_name":"Ada County","city":"1608830","city_name":"Boise City","country":"USA","winner":null,"winner_key":null,"amount":null,"linked_awards":0,"cancelled":false,"archived":false,"updated_at":"2026-09-16T21:18:12.857524Z"},{"key":"36C26027Q0035","latest_notice_id":"d3ee78eed4a9429dbe8f3d5049646553","title":"DOT Commercial Drivers Physicals & Controlled Substance Test Puget Sound VAHCS","solicitation_number":"36C26027Q0035","notice_type":"r","first_type":"r","first_posted":"2026-09-12","last_posted":"2026-09-12","notices":1,"due_at":"2026-09-17T22:00:00Z","due_date":"2026-09-17","closes_at":"2026-09-17T22:00:00Z","awardable":true,"open":true,"dept_key":"d-036","dept_name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF","sub_key":"s-3600","sub_name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF","office_key":"o-36C260","office_name":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)","naics":"621999","psc":"R408","set_aside":null,"state":"WA","county":"53033","county_name":"King County","city":null,"city_name":null,"country":"USA","winner":null,"winner_key":null,"amount":null,"linked_awards":0,"cancelled":false,"archived":false,"updated_at":"2026-09-17T06:28:38.602097Z"},{"key":"36C26026Q0346","latest_notice_id":"04a47f0fd6e64d279030fca638583a22","title":"Betterbuilt R640 Series Cart and Utensil Washer, Name Brand or Equa","solicitation_number":"36C26026Q0346","notice_type":"k","first_type":"r","first_posted":"2026-04-29","last_posted":"2026-09-11","notices":3,"due_at":"2026-09-17T23:00:00Z","due_date":"2026-09-17","closes_at":"2026-09-17T23:00:00Z","awardable":true,"open":true,"dept_key":"d-036","dept_name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF","sub_key":"s-3600","sub_name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF","office_key":"o-36C260","office_name":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)","naics":"333310","psc":"7320","set_aside":null,"state":"OR","county":"41051","county_name":"Multnomah County","city":"4159000","city_name":"Portland","country":"USA","winner":null,"winner_key":null,"amount":null,"linked_awards":0,"cancelled":false,"archived":false,"updated_at":"2026-09-16T21:18:12.857524Z"},{"key":"36C26026Q1020","latest_notice_id":"30f8b2bd9338456e80f63c2d9a76230f","title":"Environmental Liabilities Survey","solicitation_number":"36C26026Q1020","notice_type":"r","first_type":"r","first_posted":"2026-09-09","last_posted":"2026-09-09","notices":2,"due_at":"2026-09-17T23:30:00Z","due_date":"2026-09-17","closes_at":"2026-09-17T23:30:00Z","awardable":true,"open":true,"dept_key":"d-036","dept_name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF","sub_key":"s-3600","sub_name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF","office_key":"o-36C260","office_name":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)","naics":"541620","psc":"B510","set_aside":null,"state":"WA","county":"53063","county_name":"Spokane County","city":"5367000","city_name":"Spokane","country":"USA","winner":null,"winner_key":null,"amount":null,"linked_awards":0,"cancelled":false,"archived":false,"updated_at":"2026-09-16T21:18:12.857524Z"},{"key":"36C26026A1014","latest_notice_id":"b0dda835c94e439d88690aca0d9b088d","title":"SANE Services Portland VA Medical Center","solicitation_number":"36C26026A1014","notice_type":"k","first_type":"k","first_posted":"2026-09-11","last_posted":"2026-09-11","notices":1,"due_at":"2026-09-18T16:00:00Z","due_date":"2026-09-18","closes_at":"2026-09-18T16:00:00Z","awardable":true,"open":true,"dept_key":"d-036","dept_name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF","sub_key":"s-3600","sub_name":"VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF","office_key":"o-36C260","office_name":"260-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 20 (36C260)","naics":"813920","psc":"Q401","set_aside":null,"state":"OR","county":"41051","county_name":"Multnomah County","city":"4159000","city_name":"Portland","country":"USA","winner":null,"winner_key":null,"amount":null,"linked_awards":0,"cancelled":false,"archived":false,"updated_at":"2026-09-16T21:18:12.857524Z"}]}